When I recorded by April podcast today I made mention of Best’s claim that the COVID-19 vaccine was created to kill or maim people. I called it ridiculous and that observation stands.
But I was already on there myself and while I touched on this on my podcast I’ll do the full quotes here;
Do we know how long it takes for someone to die after taking the vaccine?Frankie_De_Saltos on Bit Chute “The Solution to ‘Murderous’ Vaccines” on March 30, 2021
Yes. No one will die from the vaccine. This man is a proven liar.Timelord Phil (as Timelord66) on Bit Chute “The Solution to ‘Murderous’ Vaccines” on April 5, 2021
The link is of course to the 2013 Supreme Court of Victoria decision that found Best guilty of defaming me.
This severely deranged mental case made up this whole ruling by an imaginary judge himself. The court never notified me of anything which means it never happened. I have asked Bitchute to keep this certified insane and dangerous excuse for a human away from me.John Best on Bit Chute “The Solution to ‘Murderous’ Vaccines” on April 6, 2021
I quoted this on my podcast except for the last sentence and reflected on my response. Here it is in full;
The decision is real. You were never notified because you told the Supreme Court of Victoria, Australia, that you wanted nothing to do with it and they respected that wish. That’s on you. The only reason you aren’t out the amount owed is because I can’t find a lawyer over there willing to register the decision pro bono or no win no fee. Oh and if you think the judge is fake, explain this;Timelord Phil (as Timelord66) on Bit Chute “The Solution to ‘Murderous’ Vaccines” on April 7, 2021
Same judge who presided over my win over you.
Let’s break this down – Best sent a letter to the court during the adminstrative process and His Honour Justice Stephen Kaye said the following in paragraph 5;
By the letter which he sent to court, the defendant made it clear that he did not intend to appear in the case, or to defend the claim made against him by the plaintiff.Justice Stephen Kaye, Supreme Court of Victoria, Gluyas v Best  VSC 3 (24 January 2013)
And then in paragraph 11;
The items posted by the defendant on the internet, concerning the plaintiff, contain an extraordinary level of invective and personal denigration, which, in some measure, have been repeated in two letters which he has forwarded to the court in response to the proceedings served on him.Justice Stephen Kaye, Supreme Court of Victoria, Gluyas v Best  VSC 3 (24 January 2013)
And then in paragraph 23;
In his two letters to the court, the defendant had manifested a clear intention not to defend the proceeding at all.Justice Stephen Kaye, Supreme Court of Victoria, Gluyas v Best  VSC 3 (24 January 2013)
And finally in paragraph 53;
The first aspect of aggravation consists of the two letters written by the defendant to this Court. The first letter was dated 1 April 2010, in response to the writ served on him on behalf of the plaintiff. The second letter was dated 21 March 2012 and was written in response to the amended statement of claim served on him. Both letters, and in particular the second letter, repeated some of the defamatory remarks made by the defendant about the plaintiff, and contained material which is insulting of him and which ridicules him.Justice Stephen Kaye, Supreme Court of Victoria, Gluyas v Best  VSC 3 (24 January 2013)
This is clearly why the court opted not to notify Best of the decision. He’d got on the wrong side of His Honour already because of his conduct that – certainly in my view – ran very close to an act of contempt in the face of the court.
Best’s reply clearly showed how deluded and stubborn he truly is – and I only saw this after I recorded my podcast;
I’m not going to look at another one of your fake websites. Courts always notify people, no exceptions. Since you feel so abused by me making fun of your stupidity, why don’t you stop pestering me? I haven’t said anything to or about you in many years. No Phil, courts don;t award damages to nitwits like who go looking for trouble.John Best on Bit Chute “The Solution to ‘Murderous’ Vaccines” on April 7, 2021
The ABC (Australian Broadcasting Corporation) website is one of my fake websites?? American courts might follow that procedure but in this case the Court in my home state did not and rightly so. And he accuses me of pestering him based this activity alone? Reads to me like he’s butthurt that I’m still around, and making fun of my supposed stupidity only makes him look stupid in the eyes of the world – again! That’s why I don’t feel abused at all. I was awarded damages because Best defamed me and was found guilty. It is Best who looks for trouble. As Tex Caldwell, who is also on Bit Chute, pointed out;
For the love of God, Gopher Breath, the ABC website is one of the four news websites from the TV media in Australia! I suppose you think Timelord runs the 9news, 7news and Ten as well? And the US ABC, NBC and CBS news websites too? Jesus you are out to lunch! The court did award damages and that’s a damn fact.Tex Caldwell (as Plainview4) on Bit Chute “The Solution to ‘Murderous’ Vaccines” on April 7, 2021
I wonder how Best would react to the print media websites if I linked them – like The Age, The Herald Sun, The Australian and so on. Probably call them fake websites run by me as well. He lies about these things for one reason. It proves he is terrified of me and it too stupid to acknowledge and admit it.
I fully expect more rubbish in the comments and he does have another video which Tex has already commented on.
PS – He has been banned from Twitter by the way.
One thought on “Exposed on Bit Chute”
John Best is a disgrace to the human race.