The sweet smell of success

Has Best finally given up? This was the content of his last two posts and the comments inside the first on his Facebook timeline.

Voting for D, R and Esq is against the law. Cops won’t arrest you. You just lose your freedom.

You don’t know the law.

Our supreme law was written so we can maintain our freedom and reclaim it if it’s stolen from us.

It hasn’t been stolen.

Please don’t ask attorneys if my words are true. As the Owner of the United States, I stand above all attorneys and I tell you the truth.

It is in legal precedent that you are a liar, and you don’t own squat.

Attorneys do not practice law. They practice a brutal and blind force to keep humanity enslaved to the Banksters.

The Banksters don’t exist and there is no force.

If you could learn that you are also the Owner of the United States, we could stop the attorneys from destroying our country and we could have our freedom back. It’s really that simple.

You never lost your freedom

Do you want your freedom back?

See what I just said.

( If everyone who reads this accepts the truth in it and shares it, we could have our freedom back by the end of the week.)

You only have 231 followers, Best. If they all shared it, it wouldn’t go any further because the majority of Americans will see it for what it is – a load of bunk.

Darren Ferrell “liked” my post but he wouldn’t “share” it. He thus told me he is opposed to freedom so he is now blocked. (Correction: Facebook gave me an error message when I tred to block him. It seems that Facebook has now made it impossible to bock paid trolls as I have had this problem many times lately blocking the obvious fake accounts who bother me.)

This is a typical over reaction.

Another “like” but no “share”. Another person blocked. Somebody “shared this post but Facebook won’t let me see who did that. Very strange.

Not strange. Someone shared it and then blocked him – maybe to make fun of him. Good for that person if so.

Maybe this will be my last post on Facebook. There is no point on presenting any other words. If it remains invisible and unshared, our country and our freedom are gone forever. Nobody else presents the solution of how to reclaim our freedom.

As already said, freedom was never lost.

Perhaps I will make more Bitchute videos where there is no censorship.

And the same limited audience.

The solution to everything is to unite and fire the government. No matter how many times I say that, nobody will join me. So everyone is content to let the government sodomize them. Well, I’m opposed to that.

There is no sodomy going on in American politics. You can’t fire the government – that’s treason. That’s why no one will join you.

( I put this here in a comment where nobody will see it. If I wrrite another post on Facebook, nobody will see it because Facebook will censor it. This is Protocol #12 at work.)

Re the protocol – that is a hoax. An antisemitic hoax. Those who believe it are antisemitic. That is why FB is censoring you.

I knew America was all over when I was the only one in the supermarket without a mask. But I kept writing and making videos. I hoped there were some people left who could understand the Declaration of Independence. They were all gone. They all believed the TV. They kept trusting enemy politicians. They were never going to stop voting for our enemies.

You are an idiot not wearing a mask and everyone else knew it. You don’t understand the Declaration. They do.

I tried to show them the importance of Protocol #12 but none of them would read it. They were brainwashed into abject ignorance and there they will remain.

No, they know it’s a hoax and antisemitic.

I’m leaving this matrix. They will remain. When The Singularity is in full effect, they will truly be the walking dead. All of their thoughts will come to them from The Cloud and they won’t be able to tell the difference. It’s a technology that humans have zero chance of defeating once it takes effect and it’s already started. This is the end of humanity and I did what I could to try to stop it. My words were ignored. I tried.

You can’t leave. You are human like the rest of us and there will be no walking dead. The rest of us can tell the difference between truth and lies. It’s you who can’t. You have confessed to being a traitor to the human race and we all know it. That is why you have been ignored.

And I have won. See the reports I made of your timeline over the years and the spreading of the decision of the Supreme Court of Victoria on January 24, 2013, showing that you are a liar and defamer.


Some more education for Best

I got a bit of an education from a combination of the research of Wally and the knowledge of Tex Caldwell – both long time members of my forum. This came in part from a debate on Best’s video about Dinesh D’Souza where he accused Dinesh of not telling people certain things. This accusation got seven people to thumb the video down before it was also thumbed down by me, Tex, Twinkles, Scratcher and Tegan.

This started when Best noticed the number of thumbs down (at the time ten – Twinkles and Tegan were yet to add their votes);

The “thumbs downs” show me that I have ten rank idiots who watched this. If they ask questions, they might become smarter.

John Best on the comments on the video Liar D’Souza’s 2000 Mules on July 5, 2022

We all saw it but it would be Tex who would respond, expecting the comment to be deleted;

Why should anyone ask questions when all you’ll do is either delete them or reply with insults? That’s not smart. That’s dumb.

Tex Caldwell (as Plainview4) on the comments on the video Liar D’Souza’s 2000 Mules on July 8, 2022

But it wasn’t. Best replied.

I delete attacks from trolls. Are you a troll? Try asking a question.

John Best on the comments on the video Liar D’Souza’s 2000 Mules on July 8, 2022

He did ask a question, idiot!

Wally noticed and did his research, leading to him publishing five questions on my forum. Tex quickly picked this up and delightfully added them thus;

I’ll ask several.

1. Were you aware that the Federal Reserve Act was created to stop private banks from robbing people of their actual savings a great deal more than any are now? (see for example in part the Depression of 1882 to 1885)

2. Where precisely in the Declaration of Independence does it prohibit attorneys from running for office?

3. Were you aware that the original 13th Amendment has not been ratified by the states, but it still can be right now as the 28th Amendment?

4. Will you commit to pursuing this?

5. If you fail in your quest overall, what are your intentions?

Tex Caldwell (as Plainview4) on the comments on the video Liar D’Souza’s 2000 Mules on July 11, 2022

And Best ran around that challenge like the coward he is.

You’re a funny guy. In 1913, the Rothschild family gave themselves the vehicle to steal every asset in the US from us and they did so in 1933 thanks to FDR’s illegal bankruptcy. The words “That they are absolved from all allegiance to the British Crown” barred attorneys from practicing their dranged(sic) version of “law” in our country. Common sense tells you these thusly identified enemies could not act as spies in our government and the original 13th amendment was ratified in the 1810s and did appear in printed versions of the constitution, some of which still exist. Only people opposed to having freedom take positions like you. Please stop that.

John Best on the comments on the video Liar D’Souza’s 2000 Mules on July 11, 2022

When Tex saw that he responded with this;

The four day banking holiday FDR called was not a bankruptcy. Mind you, at the time a bankruptcy would have been a good call given that GDP was at an all time low and there were no loans being offered because there was no money in any of the banks as everyone had them under their beds. Prohibition wasn’t helping either – that ended later in 1933 and that change helped because it provided jobs. The Rothschild family had no presence in the US until they arrived before and during WW2 escaping war torn Europe and the Nazi threat to the Jews. That’s historical fact. And no, the original 13th Amendment wasn’t ratified. At the time of the Amendment being sent to the states, there were 13 states needed to support it. It only ever got to 12 and by the time it got to 12 the number became 14 when Louisiana became part of the Union. It remains at 12 now. The publications you refer to were errors, including in one state that rejected the Amendment – Virginia. This was confirmed by President Monroe and Congress in 1818. By the way – the Amendment wasn’t put to prevent British interference. It was brought on a perceived threat from British enemies. France.

Two more questions;

1. What defines freedom in your eyes?

2. What proof do you have that attorneys have any connection to the British Crown?

Tex Caldwell (as Plainview4) on the comments on the video Liar D’Souza’s 2000 Mules on July 12, 2022

Interesting insight on Franklin D Roosevelt’s actions reacting to the Great Depression. It actually backs up my current argument over keeping Victoria’s GDP ahead of our debt right now because of COVID. I already knew that about the Rothschilds though as well as the current status of the original 13th Amendment although not down to the actual numbers, nor the assertion that is was caused by a threat from France. Tex didn’t address it, except with his second follow up question, but there is no connection between lawyers and the British Crown. This is an assumption by Best based on the fact that the courts in the UK used to be presided over by members of the House of Lords. Even in the old days, the House of Lords had no connection to the Crown. Best doesn’t understand how the aristocracy works. He’s just being paranoid.

But Best did avoid the first question entirely as well as the last and this wasn’t pursued. And on this occasion he ran away again;

You’re trying to argue against facts with outright lies and you’re doing it while hiding behind an alias. Sorry but facts can not be argued with. As for your queston(sic) #2, LOL. Go away.

John Best on the comments on the video Liar D’Souza’s 2000 Mules on July 12, 2022

There it is, as Tex predicted initially. The insults. Tex gave the facts. Best couldn’t answer them so he ran away, especially from the second question as indicated. I pretty much expected it and already had this entry ready and it is now posted. I was going to link it on his page but the coward has blocked me from commenting!

But he can’t delete this blog entry!

The Sixteenth Amendment

Best is back on Bitchute after a couple of computer breakdowns and he has new videos. A lot of the rhetoric is the same, including the video I am concentrating on here – titled “How to rewrite the Constitution”. Now he is ignoring the fact that rewrites have certain criteria to fulfil, preferring to think that the people can just tear it down and start again in effect. The only way to actually do that is to secede from the Union. but Best won’t say that because he is stupid.

He claims the American money is counterfeit – due to it being created by the Federal Reserve, an entity Best has always claimed is owned by the Rothschild family when it is a government authority. So all taxes are void – thereby voiding the sixteenth Amendment to the US Constitution.

Now I did some digging. The sixteenth Amendment was proposed after a Supreme Court ruling in the matter of Pollock v. Farmers’ Loan & Trust Co. This was in 1895 – 18 years before the Federal Reserve. What it did was that it prevented Congress from setting up a tax scheme that didn’t fund the states relative to it’s representation in the House of Representatives. This in effect was a disallowance of Washington DC to be able to fund it’s essential services in the same way the states could, restricted instead to tariffs that were nowhere near the mark.

But this is what Best in missing. He is totally ignoring the states. His own legislature in New Hampshire has certain powers that he is ignoring in trying to achieve what he wants. Does he really believe the states will co-operate with this? Of course not! He’s all about the people, when the people voted in their representatives in the democracy that Best totally opposes.

Congress saw the problem as a result of Pollock, and in it’s battle to control privately owned trusts that were hogging most of the money decided that the Constitution needed to be amended to allow for an income tax without interference from state interests as they stood. This was the right move, especially as it targeted said trusts that were hated by the people. Yes, Best, the people. This is how democracy works. It would not surprise me if the Rothschild family had something to do with those so they would have opposed this change!

The people who voted for the representatives in Congress approved the change. This included progressive Republicans. The numbers allowed for the two thirds required. That finally took place in 1909, with a number of Republicans deciding to support it in the belief that it wouldn’t go any further. Then it was up to the states. At this time there were 48 states so it needed 36 for the amendment to be included. And in 1913 they got them. In the end it was 42 with the last agreement coming from New Hampshire! Only Connecticut, Rhodes Island, Utah and Virginia said no and Florida and Pennsylvania didn’t even consider it. Of course Hawaii and Alaska came in much later. The US government were quick with the Revenue Act of 1913 that reduced unpopular tariffs as well as introducing the income tax they needed to function.

This is what Best denies. The need for revenue to function. Best is against government. He wants total freedom. He wants anarchy. He wants no control. He wants a free for all for individuals which will lead to the strong oppressing the weak – recreating the very situation that led to the War of Independence in the 18th century, and that also led to the creation of the trusts that took money from the people. The sixteenth Amendment provides equality – equality that Best opposes.

Best is a servant. He denies this, but he is. He is a part of the Rockingham County community. He is a servant of that community because the people vote for those who makes the rules. Best doesn’t vote, so he is a servant of those who do. Those people voted for the sixteenth Amendment. The people.

One more thing, Best. The First Amendment only applies to government. Private companies are not subject to it. That includes Facebook and Twitter. They can set their own rules and if you don’t follow them you get thrown off. I set the rules for my forum. I have that power. You set the rules of your Bitchute channel. You have that power and you do the same thing to others (like me and other members of my forum) as Facebook and Twitter does to you. Totally inconsistent and Best in a nutshell. Best has freedom of speech. He uses it on Bitchute. I use it here. You are brainwashed, Best – brainwashed by your own bullshit that you believe because you don’t understand how things work and you never ever will.

And now – an idiot

Some things never change. The title of this entry harks back to the very words I used on my podcast some time ago to introduce some Best audio snippets from his Bit Chute channel. That has been quiet since mid February, but meanwhile I caught the following rash of comments on his Facebook timeline which serve as a reminder that John Best Junior is off his rocker!

TV still has freedom of speech – for the truth. And for lies if a network wants to create controversy (Fox News are past masters of that). Of course people who are totally crazy like Best have never got on TV – except on the news when being arrested!

Again for clarity – NO ONE is the authority/authorities. The Tenth Amendment of the US Constitution prohibits the claim.

Because the states are united and have been since the American Civil War. Freedom has never been lost.

Servitude was banned by the Thirteenth Amendment. Okay I’m being a bit facetious there because it specifies involuntary servitude but it’s still a valid point. The only fool here is Best.

The police aren’t arresting any politicians because none of them have committed a crime. What’s Best’s fault here in particular is that he isn’t proving it. It’s all in his wild mixed up fantasy world.

No, Best, the domestic enemy is you for seeking to incite an act of treason. You can’t fire a government. I made it clear in the previous entry what you had to do the achieve what you wanted and all you could do was abuse me in the comments. You have no courage and should just go check yourself into Hampstead Hospital for some badly needed remedial psychiatric care to get that fantasy world of yours torn down.

You don’t own anything, Best!

After a period of over five weeks with no videos on his Bitchute channel, Best has fired up and in the space of four days uploaded five videos.

Previously, Best has called himself the highest authority – a statement prohibited by the Tenth Amendment of the US Constitution. He has now changed the wording but the message is the same – he is now calling himself an “owner”. He held two Zoom meetings that were limited the US internet users only in late 2021 – the first attracted four people (Best himself makes five). There was a similar number apparently at the second meeting – held two days after the first. But nothing advertised since.

In the first of the five recent videos – Best introduces himself as “the” owner of the United States before contradicting himself by claiming to address the other 300 million “owners” (the rest of the US population) although here he does repeat the “authority” line. It’s the same thing over again – he thinks one can remove the government just like that. That is not a democracy as I have said before. Best is anti democracy. If he wants change he has to run for public office himself. He owns nothing. He has to earn what he wants in the eyes of democratic voters – and he doesn’t have the skill, intelligence or connections to do it.

This is what he has to do in detail;

  1. Form a new political party.
  2. Garner 435 party members to run in the election that is held every two years for the House of Representatives in Washington DC.
  3. Garner 100 party members to run in the election for seats in the Senate every time a seat becomes available (34 of them are up in November this year)
  4. Garner 50 party members to run in the next election at state level whenever that may be.
  5. Garner an additional number of party members in each state (whatever the number is required per state) to run in the next election at state level whenever that may be.
  6. Announce himself as running for President of the United States.
  7. Win a majority of seats in the House of Reps and win all 34 seats up for the next Senate election in November 2022.
  8. Win any state election included the Governorship of any states that have an election between now and November 2024.
  9. Win the Presidency via the electoral college in November 2024, retain the majority in the House of Reps and win all 31 seats in the Senate election at that time.
  10. If 38 states are a part of the new political party – change the Constitution to what you want, including the banning of lawyers from the political system and the revamp of the Supreme Court of the United States.

That’s it, Best. There is NO OTHER WAY TO DO IT!

But you don’t have the guts.

The other option is to prove in a court of law that every politician in office at federal and state level is corrupt. But you can’t. That’s because you’re talking out of your rear end. The politicians are not your servants. They are your elected representatives. You don’t like them – that’s fine. Vote for someone else instead. That is how it works. Best doesn’t want anything to do with that process.

He also describes the last sentence of the Declaration of Independence;
“And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.”
He claims that this prohibits lawyers from running for public office. That’s rubbish – no such restriction exists based on that.

Best is clearly showing in this video alone that he is crazy. He is giving orders. He thinks what he is saying is absolutely true and won’t talk about anything else. He refuses to create a website himself claiming he can’t – and won’t go back to school and learn (he thinks that once you leave the education system that’s it – you can’t go back). He’s a bully and thinks that bullying will get people to agree with him. He abuses people who won’t get what he says as though all Americans are dumb. Best is dumb. He is twisted. He is sick – and most of all he is a liar. A proven liar – as has been proven in a court of law. To back that up – he lied about the owner of the first bank in the United States in Philadelphia. It wasn’t Mayer Rothschild (note that Best doesn’t give a first name here because he can’t as he is lying like I said). It was Thomas Willing. The Rothschild family didn’t even enter the US until the eve of WW2 to escape Nazi Germany’s influence!

One positive – Best kicked a white supremacist out of his second meeting (where he gave a non committal reference to the numbers as reflected above). At least he had the right idea there. But his equality line can’t be respected until he accepts Autism as a part of it. And he won’t do that.

This was all derived from the first video. The only thing I need to add right now is that he has a group on Facebook. It is my intention to report it, but I have to find out which community standard to use to get it removed. It is a group formed not for owners, but for traitors to the United States. That is what Best is – a traitor.

Lying in his video comments

I only caught this today in the comments of a video Best put on BitChute a few days ago. It was called “Donald Trump, Murderer”.

Someone called Frankie De Saltos asked the following question;

I don’t think we know anything about you apart from your opinions about the Federal Reserve, the lawyers and Politicians and the Constitution. However below you mentioned you were an officer in the USAF. Would you ever consider uploading videos giving us insight into your various life experiences?

Frankie De Saltos on Best’s Bitchute video on October 12, 2021

Obviously this one isn’t familiar with Hating Autism thankfully – and this is why I created this blog entry; Best’s reply – which I will take to bits as only I can!

All of the videos I make are because Congress poisoned my son into autism with mercury in vaccines in 1996.

John Best Junior (as John Best) on his Bitchute Video on October 12, 2021

That didn’t happen because Autism is not caused by mercury poisoning. This has been proven time and time again.

After that, I learned the specifics of what made Congress so evil and psychopathic.

John Best Junior (as John Best) on his Bitchute Video on October 12, 2021

He learned no such thing.

We have to stop many other crimes against humanity before we can stop Congress from poisoning babies with mercury to damage their brains.

John Best Junior (as John Best) on his Bitchute Video on October 12, 2021

The last part of that is hate speech against the Autistic community, which I am aiming to have become law in Victoria at least if not Australia at some point soon. Autism is not brain damage.

So while my videos may be about several specific topics, they are all related to autism.

John Best Junior (as John Best) on his Bitchute Video on October 12, 2021

None of them have anything to do with Autism – at all.

I made about 200 viddeos on YouTube before they started deleting everything and forced me to move to Btchute. Some of those ideos talk about autism.

John Best Junior (as John Best) on his Bitchute Video on October 12, 2021

I know about those videos – including the ones that mocked Amanda Baggs and Autism itself as well as one that abused the heck out of then President Barack Obama. One of the ones that made fun of Autism caused the creation of my reply video on the John Best Junior Fan Club.

I don’t want to write an autobiography. I just want to wipe out autism but I have to address the evil of the Banksters to do that.

John Best Junior (as John Best) on his Bitchute Video on October 12, 2021

Autism can not be “wiped out”. That’s eugenics in action. The real reason he won’t write an autobiography is because he’ll get sued for the contents and he will also lie about people who are no longer with us – like Amanda Baggs. He’ll also lie about himself (eg I am certain he left the Air Force via a dishonourable discharge) and so many other things. And remember this – when he talks about the “Banksters”, he is actually talking about the Rothschild family. A family that has zero to do with the banks. That is a conspiracy theory that reeks of antisemitism..

Best and his deluded allies

First off, the comments on the last entry were deleted on the video by Best. He didn’t like the truth being told and when I fought back by linking the previous entry he gagged me removing consequent comments. Not going to work, Best, because I recorded them and here you go;

The owner of this account is the same as the United States government – censors commentary that he doesn’t like. Hypocrisy right there.

Timelord Phil (as Timelord66) on Bit Chute “The Solution to ‘Murderous’ Vaccines” on April 8, 2021

You’re a gutless wonder, Best. You’re fired. I will keep fighting you from afar so the world knows that you are the severely deranged mental case. And there isn’t a thing you can do about it either. You are powerless. You have nothing.

Timelord Phil (as Timelord66) on Bit Chute “The Solution to ‘Murderous’ Vaccines” on April 8, 2021

The second comment actually lasted awhile but it was inevitably deleted.

Meanwhile, Best put up a new video; “Gerald Celente, Controlled Opposition Liar”. Celente is a financial doom merchant who has been predicting the downfall of the United States since the early 1990’s. He jumped on the GFC and most recently the various recessions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. This would again be the sort of person that would be a good ally for Best but as always he alienates them. I say that without seeing the video because this entry about the comments, in particular someone called Day Tripper;

Anna Von Reitz takes the history back to before the Fed. She’s stated that the court system was usurped after the civil and common law (law of the land) was replaced with the maritime law system which was only meant to apply to shipping. The barristers and lawyers are basically just shipping clerks with no jurisdiction in common law.

The creation of the Fed was certainly an important event though, that’s when the money system was seized and the birth certificate fraud was implemented.

Anna now has a streamlined system to extricate yourself from the fraudulently imposed maritime system.

Day Tripper on the Bit Chute “Gerald Celente, Controlled Opposition Liar” on April 8, 2021

Von Reitz is another nutcase who has also been alienated by Best despite being a good ally. She is full of conspiracy junk. As I have said before, the Federal Reserve was created by the US government under their Constitutional right to coin money. As I said specifically in the entry here about the Declaration of Independence it says “establish commerce” – which is the same thing.

I talked to Anna Von Reitz many times. She blocked me on Facebook because she pretends she’s too stupid to understand the Declaration of Independence and she couldn’t face me when I pointed this out to her.
You don’t have to play any “legal” gaes[sic] with attorneys to stop the abuse. You have the power to arrest all of the attorneys as spies. Anna does not want you to know this because she abets the government.

John Best on the Bit Chute “Gerald Celente, Controlled Opposition Liar” on April 8, 2021

No you don’t, Best. You have no such power. You have to report them to the authorities as spies and have the evidence to prove it. And you have nothing.

I’ll take your word on honor for that John.

I’s[sic] hard to know who to trust but from the way you speak and write it seems we’re coming at this from the same angle. We have to step out of (and above) their bogus fraudulent jurisdiction and reclaim our standing as men.

We created the government so they stand under us.

Day Tripper on the Bit Chute “Gerald Celente, Controlled Opposition Liar” on April 8, 2021

No, idiot, the government was created by the Declaration of Independence and empowered by the Constitution.

Thomas Jefferson would slap Anna Von Reitz in the head for ignoring our supreme law that he wrote for us

John Best on the Bit Chute “Gerald Celente, Controlled Opposition Liar” on April 9, 2021

Thomas Jefferson, who was Autistic, would slap John Best in the head for failing the understand the reality of what he wrote!

Have you seen any of the recent work from Christopher James from John ?

He’s making all the right noises and exposing the fraud but he’s also in bed with Chris Sky who has recently aligned himself with a billionaire banker who is creating a political party. Chris wants to fight the system from within the “legal” system which is a bit like joining the mafia in the hope of cleaning it up. I’d love to put my faith in both of those guys but when I hear the words banker and political party I start to loose faith and their credibility comes into question.

Day Tripper on the Bit Chute “Gerald Celente, Controlled Opposition Liar” on April 9, 2021

On the contrary, they know that creating a political party is the only way. They need the votes of the people – the only authority the people have – to gain the power they want to supposedly change things. We all saw what happened when a single person in the Whitehouse tried to wreck the establishment for his own ends. We had anarchy that culminated on Capitol Hill on January 6.

That’s where the comments stand. Idiots attract idiots.

But I do know this and I’m going to claim it anyway – the reason why Best is not getting any traction is because of me. The combination of the blogs (this one and the HARB), the Truth About John Best Junior Facebook page and the decision of the Supreme Court of Victoria. Best thinks it’s fake. The real world knows otherwise.

Exposed on Bit Chute

When I recorded by April podcast today I made mention of Best’s claim that the COVID-19 vaccine was created to kill or maim people. I called it ridiculous and that observation stands.

But I was already on there myself and while I touched on this on my podcast I’ll do the full quotes here;

Do we know how long it takes for someone to die after taking the vaccine?

Frankie_De_Saltos on Bit Chute “The Solution to ‘Murderous’ Vaccines” on March 30, 2021

Yes. No one will die from the vaccine. This man is a proven liar.

Timelord Phil (as Timelord66) on Bit Chute “The Solution to ‘Murderous’ Vaccines” on April 5, 2021

The link is of course to the 2013 Supreme Court of Victoria decision that found Best guilty of defaming me.

This severely deranged mental case made up this whole ruling by an imaginary judge himself. The court never notified me of anything which means it never happened. I have asked Bitchute to keep this certified insane and dangerous excuse for a human away from me.

John Best on Bit Chute “The Solution to ‘Murderous’ Vaccines” on April 6, 2021

I quoted this on my podcast except for the last sentence and reflected on my response. Here it is in full;

The decision is real. You were never notified because you told the Supreme Court of Victoria, Australia, that you wanted nothing to do with it and they respected that wish. That’s on you. The only reason you aren’t out the amount owed is because I can’t find a lawyer over there willing to register the decision pro bono or no win no fee. Oh and if you think the judge is fake, explain this;
Same judge who presided over my win over you.

Timelord Phil (as Timelord66) on Bit Chute “The Solution to ‘Murderous’ Vaccines” on April 7, 2021

Let’s break this down – Best sent a letter to the court during the adminstrative process and His Honour Justice Stephen Kaye said the following in paragraph 5;

By the letter which he sent to court, the defendant made it clear that he did not intend to appear in the case, or to defend the claim made against him by the plaintiff.

Justice Stephen Kaye, Supreme Court of Victoria, Gluyas v Best [2013] VSC 3 (24 January 2013)

And then in paragraph 11;

The items posted by the defendant on the internet, concerning the plaintiff, contain an extraordinary level of invective and personal denigration, which, in some measure, have been repeated in two letters which he has forwarded to the court in response to the proceedings served on him.

Justice Stephen Kaye, Supreme Court of Victoria, Gluyas v Best [2013] VSC 3 (24 January 2013)

And then in paragraph 23;

In his two letters to the court, the defendant had manifested a clear intention not to defend the proceeding at all.

Justice Stephen Kaye, Supreme Court of Victoria, Gluyas v Best [2013] VSC 3 (24 January 2013)

And finally in paragraph 53;

The first aspect of aggravation consists of the two letters written by the defendant to this Court. The first letter was dated 1 April 2010, in response to the writ served on him on behalf of the plaintiff. The second letter was dated 21 March 2012 and was written in response to the amended statement of claim served on him. Both letters, and in particular the second letter, repeated some of the defamatory remarks made by the defendant about the plaintiff, and contained material which is insulting of him and which ridicules him.

Justice Stephen Kaye, Supreme Court of Victoria, Gluyas v Best [2013] VSC 3 (24 January 2013)

This is clearly why the court opted not to notify Best of the decision. He’d got on the wrong side of His Honour already because of his conduct that – certainly in my view – ran very close to an act of contempt in the face of the court.

Best’s reply clearly showed how deluded and stubborn he truly is – and I only saw this after I recorded my podcast;

I’m not going to look at another one of your fake websites. Courts always notify people, no exceptions. Since you feel so abused by me making fun of your stupidity, why don’t you stop pestering me? I haven’t said anything to or about you in many years. No Phil, courts don;t award damages to nitwits like who go looking for trouble.

John Best on Bit Chute “The Solution to ‘Murderous’ Vaccines” on April 7, 2021

The ABC (Australian Broadcasting Corporation) website is one of my fake websites?? American courts might follow that procedure but in this case the Court in my home state did not and rightly so. And he accuses me of pestering him based this activity alone? Reads to me like he’s butthurt that I’m still around, and making fun of my supposed stupidity only makes him look stupid in the eyes of the world – again! That’s why I don’t feel abused at all. I was awarded damages because Best defamed me and was found guilty. It is Best who looks for trouble. As Tex Caldwell, who is also on Bit Chute, pointed out;

For the love of God, Gopher Breath, the ABC website is one of the four news websites from the TV media in Australia! I suppose you think Timelord runs the 9news, 7news and Ten as well? And the US ABC, NBC and CBS news websites too? Jesus you are out to lunch! The court did award damages and that’s a damn fact.

Tex Caldwell (as Plainview4) on Bit Chute “The Solution to ‘Murderous’ Vaccines” on April 7, 2021

I wonder how Best would react to the print media websites if I linked them – like The Age, The Herald Sun, The Australian and so on. Probably call them fake websites run by me as well. He lies about these things for one reason. It proves he is terrified of me and it too stupid to acknowledge and admit it.

I fully expect more rubbish in the comments and he does have another video which Tex has already commented on.

PS – He has been banned from Twitter by the way.

Best on Twitter

Best has mentioned this before and just recently I found his current Twitter account

And of course his tweets are maniacal as ever. See for yourself.

Again, Best, COVID-19 is NOT a hoax! It is real and has killed ? people in New Hampshire alone.

You wake up, Best. Bioweapons KILL! The COVID vaccine does no such thing!

Because the Federal Reserve owns nothing, and you can’t fire government as that would be unconstitutional and anti democratic.

The police aren’t tax collectors, you idiot! And yes, they do know what treason is – and you DON’T!

Masks are the best protection from COVID-19 until we have the vaccine out there in full. TV doesn’t violate freedom of speech as they are entitled to decide not to transmit lies.

Best at it again with his lies. Hitler was after all Jews – no exceptions. Calling democratically elected officials terrorists is delusional. The Federal Reserve was created in 1913 by Americans and is run by America via a legally valid law, and has nothing to do with anyone outside the USA let alone the Rothschilds.

There doesn’t need to be a penalty for the judge! They just make decisions and if they get overruled by a higher court, that in upon itself is a black mark against the original judge.

Who isn’t supervising them properly? You, Best? This comment is his usual demand for them to fire the government (AKA a military coup).

Remember, people, Best is a legally recognised liar. Fact.

The Declaration of Independence

I was waiting for the debut of Version 13 of Phil’s World to post this. Back in the period from March to May, Best was running his mouth about the COVID-19 pandemic being a hoax and howling blue murder over the restrictions. At certain points he claimed that the hard and fast rule was the United States Declaration of Independence, and nothing else mattered. He specified that as the Declaration being the “only law”.

What a lot of rot!

This is the basis of John Best Junior’s sheer lunacy. I have looked at the Declaration. It’s purpose was to depart from the British Empire and cease to be a British Colony. That’s all. Nothing more. To claim it as the rule of law in 2020 is ridiculous because it has no base upon which an unwritten law can be acted on. That’s why one of the first things the new country did was formulate a Constitution. THAT is the base upon which laws can and should be made. Best in effect is saying that the Constitution has no validity.

So let’s look at this in detail. Even though the Declaration of Independence was originally laid out as one all encompassing document, it has been broken down into sections without changing any of the words. The first section is the introduction;

In CONGRESS, July 4, 1776.

The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America,

“When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.”

The modern definition of this is; “Asserts as a matter of Natural Law the ability of a people to assume political independence; acknowledges that the grounds for such independence must be reasonable, and therefore explicable, and ought to be explained. “

I look on it as simply the background reasoning to America breaking away from Britain, simply stating that those who reside in America did not like the British rules and they had a right to say no and do their own thing. Fair enough.

The second section is the preamble;

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.–That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed,–That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.

The modern definition of this is; “Outlines a general philosophy of government that justifies revolution when government harms natural rights.”

Now this is key to Best’s translation which is wrong. He is claiming that this part enables the People to fire Congress. That isn’t true because the only way to do that by this precedent is to do what America did in 1776 – depart from the prevailing rule and create your own country. Best isn’t advocating that and that’s why his translation is based in a fallacy. The right of the people to alter or abolish is already present – through fair and equal elections. That’s a Democracy. You have to remember that at the time, Britain was ruled not by the monarchy alone but by the House of Lords, with the House of Commons existing but not having anywhere near the power that it has now – indeed the position of Prime Minister had not gained the proper standing. The reigning monarch was still in proper charge.

Now remember that this section is a preamble. It had no legal validity as such. It simply extends from the introduction the reasons why America wanted independence from Britain. This is what Best doesn’t get.

The third section is the indictment;

Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.

*He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.
*He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.
*He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.
*He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their Public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.
*He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness of his invasions on the rights of the people.
*He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected, whereby the Legislative Powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the meantime exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.
*He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands.
*He has obstructed the Administration of Justice by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary Powers.
*He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.
*He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harass our people and eat out their substance.
*He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures.
*He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil Power.
*He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:
*For quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:
*For protecting them, by a mock Trial from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States:
*For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world:
*For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent:
*For depriving us in many cases, of the benefit of Trial by Jury:
*For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences:
*For abolishing the free System of English Laws in a neighbouring Province, establishing therein an Arbitrary government, and enlarging its Boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these Colonies:
*For taking away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable Laws and altering fundamentally the Forms of our Governments:
*For suspending our own Legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.
*He has abdicated Government here, by declaring us out of his Protection and waging War against us.
*He has plundered our seas, ravaged our coasts, burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.
*He is at this time transporting large Armies of foreign Mercenaries to compleat the works of death, desolation, and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty & Perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the Head of a civilized nation.
*He has constrained our fellow Citizens taken Captive on the high Seas to bear Arms against their Country, to become the executioners of their friends and Brethren, or to fall themselves by their Hands.
*He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.
*In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Prince, whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.”

The only addition to this in modern terms is; “A bill of particulars documenting the king’s “repeated injuries and usurpations” of the Americans’ rights and liberties.”

There are quite a few similarities here between the colonial governments in America and the colonial governments in Australia. We had what was called the Rum Rebellion, as well as Eureka Stockade. But I suspect as a result of the experience with America, the British learned something of a lesson and were more co-operative with Australia. That’s why we are a Commonwealth country instead of a Republic. But I digress.

These are in effect court charges against the reigning British monarch – at the time George the third (the grandfather of Queen Victoria). Now at the time as well the courts in Britain were presided over by Lords in the House of Lords, something unthinkable nowadays. Many early court decisions were made by Lords – most notably in my view one of the first rulings in the matter of defamation; R v Burdett in 1820. Now I don’t have an issue with these claims. The British Empire was at times very stubborn and xenophobic (see for example the original section 127 of the Australian Constitution which was a British document approved by Australia which deemed the Australian Aborigines to not be a part of the population – a section that was repealed by referendum in 1967) and the monarchy was inaccessible. That barrier only started to come down with Queen Victoria, although it took until George the sixth for that to become something of the norm and only because of World War 2.

But this is the point. These charges were brought against the reigning British monarch and in the absence of a fair trial (which in essence was impossible and the American’s knew it) the only solution was breaking away entirely. Hence the basis of the Declaration. The fact that these charges are long since obsolete takes away any legal validity.

The fourth section is the denunciation;

Nor have We been wanting in attentions to our British brethren. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which, would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our Separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, Enemies in War, in Peace Friends.

The modern interpretation is; “This section essentially finishes the case for independence. The conditions that justified revolution have been shown.”

Not only that, it also shows respect for the British consequent to the clearing of the air between them – as equals consistent with the very first sentence of the Preamble. And yet Best shows the British no respect at all. That’s consistent with his warped claims, but he is still wrong.

The fifth section is the conclusion;

We, therefore, the Representatives of the united States of America, in General Congress, Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name, and by Authority of the good People of these Colonies, solemnly publish and declare, That these united Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States; that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as Free and Independent States, they have full Power to levy War, conclude Peace, contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent States may of right do. And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.

The modern interpretation is; “The signers assert that there exist conditions under which people must change their government, that the British have produced such conditions and, by necessity, the colonies must throw off political ties with the British Crown and become independent states. The conclusion contains, at its core, the Lee Resolution that had been passed on July 2.”

Now if this is the law as Best says – he needs to pay attention to two words;
Establish Commerce.

If this was the law, this is the authority that allows Congress to do what Best thinks they can’t do. Create money! And everything associated with it including guess what? A RESERVE BANK!

The sixth and final section is simply the signatures of the representatives of the original 13 states.

Best – this document is NOT the law! It can NOT be the law – not by itself. It needs back up, and that back up comes in the form of the Constitution. Then there are the amendments, the first ten of which are the Bill of Rights. Best you violate the Bill of Rights constantly – in particular the Tenth Amendment when you call yourself the Authority. That Amendment prohibits that claim from anyone all the way up to the President! Not to mention the fifth Amendment in a time of public danger refusing to held accountable for his lies re COVID-19, the seventh Amendment where he constantly puts up common law complaints withOUT a jury’s decision thinking himself to be the judge, the eighth Amendment where he has called for a coup against the government in Washington in the past and the ninth Amendment where he is trying (and not succeeding – I hope) to deprive others of their rights to live free of disease – COVID-19.

I said this on the May edition of my podcast and I’ll repeat it here. Stop talking about firing Congress, because you can’t. You have to contest an election against them, and you don’t have the guts to do that properly. You are nothing but a squealing spoilt brat and a coward. You need to be medicated as you are totally out of your mind.