Probably never.

What am I talking about? I was going through Best’s Autism Fraud blog to see if there was anything I could use for the court action, and I came across an entry that wasn’t a duplicate from Hating Autism. It was called “Useless Parents of Autistic Children”, and it was a complaint against the membership of an Autism Mercury group on Yahoo. From what I could tell, he basically went to town on them for not doing enough to spread the word about their view re mercury. The result was that they were labelled cowards in effect.

This is Best at his predictable bullying worst. If anyone – even those on his side – don’t carry his can, he kicks them as hard as he can, even when they’re down. He has a one track mind and is completely incapable of being rational. Any other method of fighting his battle is just the same as supporting Big Pharma.

The reality is that mercury has nothing to do with Autism. Nothing. It’s existence goes to before thiomersal, dental amalgams and mining – as the Wild Boy of Aveyron proves. I just wish there was a way to confirm the anecdotal material that is supposed to exist that proves it existed in Ancient Greece.

I went to Best’s Autism Fraud blog because it was linked on his latest entry on Hating Autism, as I was interested in what was on that blog as I thought it was originally for his comments about Amanda Baggs.

As it turns out there’s a lot of material there – so much in fact that I think this blog may in fact replace Hating Autism should I get that blog deleted in my current legal action. I’ll compare the entries there to Hating Autism when I have time, but for now I want to concentrate on one entry from June 21, where he tells the world that he was kicked off the Party’s Facebook page for posting the infamous picture of his car with the words “Flu Shots Cause Autism” on it. He also complains about how his comments on the page were ignored.

I’m not surprised. Heck, he makes his usual call about mercury poisoning and he still expects people to believe him? We all know that the ONLY vaccine that is used in the US that contains thiomersal is the flu shot, and even then there is a thiomersal free version available! But he doesn’t tell anyone that does he? The Canary Party ownership know that thiomersal is not the issue. They are pushing the environmental causation line in general (and ignoring the genetic factor of course) – at least from that side.

Best mentions Ginger Taylor in particular. Taylor – an Autistic enemy – targets vaccines in general and has a focus on the number of vaccines as causation. She does have thiomersal in her sights but she goes wider than that as I indicate in the article on her on my website. Apparently she’s the one in charge of the Facebook page.

But the reality is that as much as the Canary Party is up the creek on several levels (my entry about them elsewhere covers that as well as the positives of the party), they know a lunatic when they see one. Best is a lunatic. I congratulate them on getting this right. Best is not a “true” autistic activist. He is a bad parent who allowed his son to wallow in the depths of intense pain for at least four years creating a massive sensory overload that his son may never recover from. That is Best’s fault, and he should be called to a count for it in public.

Whether or not my lawsuit against him will achieve that I don’t know, but it will achieve the deletion of his other blogs. Whether or not this one can be attached depends on the number of duplicated entries. I’ll look into that when I can.

After the non event at the mid terms last November, one would have thought Best might have got the message. In that election – he ran as what’s called a write in candidate. That means you can just write in who you want to vote for instead of any of the registered candidates.

According to the statistics – write ins (noted in the stats as “scatter”) numbered 439 for the entire state of New Hampshire. That was less than 0.1 percent of the vote for goodness sake! And the more local you go, the worse the percentage! At state level the scatter was 0.09%. In Rockingham county it was 0.08%. In Londonderry – 0.07%! And that’s assuming that every write in vote was for Best, and that’s no guarantee at all! The point is that NO ONE knew he was running as a write in! In effect.

Contrast this to what I had planned for the state election here before it fell through. For one thing, I would have been registered and on the ballot paper. You can’t do write ins here so I would have had to. Second, I would have been hitting several different towns in the district during two weeks worth of hard campaigning. I doubt Best went out his door once to campaign. Disadvantage from the get go. And then there would have been the print media and local TV and radio. That’s how you campaign properly, Best!

But did he get the message?

Nope!

I note that he has started 2011 with a series of ridiculous claims. Aside from the fact that he’s running as a write in again – get a load of these policy ideas!

1. Replace all bureaucrats with non Harvard/Yale graduates; how many honest citizens understand the political process by law? Not many, idiot!

2. Seize the Federal Reserve; you’ll already have it you idiot!

3. Declare all mortgages paid in full; that will cause the stock exchange to crash as the banks fall over and destroy millions of jobs and business would be wrecked. Way to fix a country already in trouble, moron! You need the banks whether you like it or not!

4. Free homes for everyone; so who would pay to build them, idiot? A home is not a right. It’s a privilege only available to those who work for it. That’s always been the way and it always will be. Best only has this policy because he is in trouble himself with his own mortgage.

5. Ban all corporations; so who employs people, idiot?

6. Take control of all media; here we go – that’s Soviet policy! Make of that what you will!

If Best’s policies were applied, the American economy would completely collapse. His new currency would be worthless, and his prediction about inflation would be the opposite. If he thinks things are ordinary right now between the US dollar and the Australian dollar – if he had his way, our dollar would end up being worth $1000 Best dollars! At least!

Best fails in economics. He is against the very freedom he preaches because he would be preventing people’s ability to earn money. If anything is a right – it’s that. His policies would undermine that and make America the laziest country in the world and a laughing stock.

Just like Best.

He couldn’t get in on the popular vote anyway. The votes that count for the Presidency are in the electoral college, and he won’t get a single vote from there!

It’s been quite a frustrating few days for me, but the solution has been beyond great.

It looked like a lack of co-operation by parties who I shall not name were threatening to derail the defamation action against Best. But I found a way around it – applying to the Supreme Court of Victoria for a substituted or informal service. I then opted to send the summons for the application to Best via email, which was a smart move on my part because he replied with the following rubbish;

This sounds like a threat, Phil. I don’t open attachments that are sent to me by severely deranged mental cases. I’ve heard that they can harm my computer.

Why don’t you just tell me why you want to drag me into court and maybe we can settle this thing. I’m not skilled at bargaining with mentally impaired dimwits though so I’m not sure that will be possible.

He’s making excuses! So I send the following answer;

A legal threat, Best, which is not the sort of threat you’re talking about. That attachment is the summons to attend court. It will do no damage to your computer. This email you sent shows that you received it and I can show that to the court to prove that you know about it. I’m dragging you to court because you defamed me, stole my intellectual property and invaded my privacy (the unlisted phone number). And you have had your chance to do the right thing. You’ve had more than a few chances and ignored them each time. So there will be no negotiation, bargaining or anything else.

And calling me mentally impaired yet again just proves the point – you have no idea.

The idiot sent an answer to this which I will not be responding to except here;

Phil, All I know about your alleged summons is that you claim it’s in an attachment you sent me. Since you are a liar and are certainly not trustworthy, I’m not going to open it which means you have never informed me of anything.

Oh yes I did – see what I said above! He is lying about me and he can’t use that as an excuse. Notwithstanding the fact that I didn’t have to send him this summons.

As you know from reading my blog, I have proven beyond any doubt that you are a severely deranged mental case which means that nothing I have written about you is defamation.

No, I can prove beyond doubt that you are lying about me. That IS defamation.

I didn’t steal anything from you. I did copy part of your blog. Since you think you can break copyright laws by copying my blog, you give tacit agreement for me to copy yours.

Yes you did. You stole my name and used it without my permission! As far as copying my WEBSITE is concerned (not blog) that wasn’t fair use because you were banned from my website and you knew it. My copying you is legal because I’m not banned from your blog and under Section 41 of the Copyright Act (and for the record Chapter 1 Part 107 of US Copyright law says the same thing) it can be copied to criticise and review.

You gave me your phone number, left it on my answering machine. You never told me it was an unpublished number or asked me to keep it private so I shared it with the world.

When I told you it was you should have deleted it then, and you didn’t. The answering machine was intended for your wife – not you.

Some psychologists might want to contact you to do a study on imbeciles and they might even pay you for your time. So, I probably did you a favor by possibly helping you find some employment.

If any psychologist wanted to do such a study – it would be done on Best.

Now, if you send me a proper invitation to come watch you make a fool out of yourself in court, with plane tickets included, I might show up. But, threatening me with attachments to emails that I will never see doesn’t seem to be proper legal etiquette.

It is when you avoided the previous summons by having your wife lie to the Deputy Sheriff about your whereabouts. Your choice not to open the attachment will backfire on you – as will your refusal to file an appearance.

Now that I have a copy of the Affidavit with hopefully the original on it’s way by air mail and getting to the Court before the next hearing, it’s just a matter of the application for leave to proceed being approved. And I expect that to be a given. Then the next step will be the trial which will be unopposed and I’ll be able to prove with evidence that Best’s blogs need to be ordered taken down. With no opposition present, I’ll win. The damages may be a little harder to prove, but I am going for it.

These emails will be printed for the judge to see if he asks.

Only two posts on Hating Autism since May 24.

I think it’s obvious – Best is on the run and waiting for the legal proceedings to conclude here, upon his assumption that I will lose and be locked up.

Wrong!

For a start, I can easily prove that Best knows about the action and the fact that he is not taking it seriously. I can prove that he is malicious and abuses his First Amendment rights by vilifying those on the Autistic Spectrum (“brain damage” etc). I can prove that his assertion about mercury poisoning is a lie AND that he has been told and is aware of it and refuses to listen.

I am waiting for more paperwork at present (I’m not saying who from) and when I get it I have liberty to make another date with the Supreme Court of Victoria. I don’t need to let Best know because he has already avoided service once, and I intend to seek permission of the Court to send the material to Best via email. Of course that’s subject to getting leave to proceed in the matter without Best – but I expect that to be a given.

I must admit I’m enjoying seeing Best be silent. I expect it to continue and it’s great!

Best has now apparently dumped his run for the Presidency in 2012 for now (I base that on the fact that his blog on the subject is still there) to try and run for the US Senate seat in New Hampshire that is up for grabs in November in the mid term elections. As I type this, the Republican candidate is yet to be decided on but the two front runners are Kelly Ayotte and Bill Binnie.

Ayotte copped a spray on Hating Autism over the Autism issue, but Best is again running this BS line about the Rothschild family. Now if he thinks for one second that he can do something about that (forgetting for the moment that the problem doesn’t exist) as a single independent Senator in a chamber of a total of 99 party aligned politicians – with Best being number 100 – he is kidding. The only way he could do anything is if he held the balance of power (as is the case in our own Senate with two independents – I don’t recognise Family First as a party – holding the balance of power there), and I would call that scary as anything!

This is all on Best’s latest video on You Tube.

Another point – there WERE Autistic children in New Hampshire in 1993 and before. They were DXed as mentally retarded. This was corrected in the DSM-IV in 1994. I don’t need to say anything else that I haven’t already said on that subject.

Best will ignore those who tell the truth about Autism and it’s origins – and the truth about the federal reserve in the United States. He won’t do what is in the best interests of voters in New Hampshire. He will only do what is in the best interests of his own little fantasy world that he is trying to press on the state of New Hampshire and on the country on the United States. So don’t vote for him – give him the widest berth you can. He’s crazy.

As a side note, one can tell from the background that he still resides in the home he always has (except for that period where he was in a Salem hotel during the aborted divorce battle). And he still can’t equalise the sound with the vision AND fix the focus on his camera!

Best brought the philgluyas5 blog out of hidden status in order to address the Google case in VCAT – and promptly misrepresented it.

But of bigger concern was the post that he’d put on the blog while it was hidden. He referred to my two phone calls to his wife during the divorce battle – and claimed that I was ringing to get her help in the defamation lawsuit. The only help I was after in relation to that was getting Best’s new address (at the time he’d been kicked out and was living elsewhere – subsequently I found that it was a motel in Salem). But I was also intending to help her in her efforts to get sole custody of Sam and the other child by providing evidence against Best that she may not have been aware of.

But in that post he also included my unlisted and silent home phone number!

Tex saw it first and alerted me and I thank him for that, but as usual Google were slow in removing it!! It should have been deleted instantly!! It still remains online as we speak!!

Thankfully though there have been no unwelcome phone calls. Best is an idiot!

But on the reference to the VCAT hearing – a few points. It was NOT a lawsuit, and Best was not the defendant. It was an administrative action designed to charge Google with discriminatory behaviour. Overthrow the USA? The man’s a lunatic! Best never clobbered me. Google did – and they will pay the price for it eventually.

This has been added to my defamation case against Best. He again made the call for those who reject curing Autism to be locked up, and called me crazed yet again. Yes, I am trying to cure one person who claims to cure Autism – John Best Junior. Because it’s impossible and chelation is potentially harmful as a treatment, even when it’s used correctly. He should be silenced and he will be in relation to me. The aim of the lawsuit is to have it in writing that John Best Junior is wrong per a court decision and spread it as far as I can. The only way he can do anything about that is to appeal the decision in the court that the decision was made – down here in Victoria.

But he won’t do it. He is now in hiding, and in the process he has avoided service of a summons – for now. I’m not beaten by this tactic. In fact the opposite is true. This tactic will help me. A subject that goes into hiding is a guilty subject and will be promoted as such. The only way he can avoid this now is to stay in hiding. But it won’t save his blogs. Each of them will be deleted without a defence, and that includes the back ups and everything else because it is my intention to have his entire account ordered deleted.

And unless he comes out of hiding and faces the music, there is nothing he can do to stop it.

I was inspired to write this after seeing the Doctor Who 2010 season episode “The Time of Angels”. It talked of fear. The Weeping Angels preyed on fear, and used it as a weapon – based on the idea of “Blink and you’re dead” (the name of the episode in 2007 that also featured the Weeping Angels was appropriately titled “Blink”).

Personally, I’m of the view that people who use fear to achieve a gain are heinous people. This of course doesn’t mean to say that I don’t use that tactic. I have – to my shame. But whenever I have it has always been to fight back against someone who is trying to scare me. Originating scaremongers – as distinct from those fighting fear – are the true cowards.

This is John Best Junior that I am describing.

He is scared. Scared of the Autistic Spectrum. It scares him because he doesn’t understand it and doesn’t want to understand it. So like everyone else, he rushes into face value solutions and clutching at straws in the process. He’s known about his son’s Autism since the age of 1. That was more than 10 years ago. Now how much has he learnt in that time period? The same amount anyone who is scared and let’s that fear rule their thinking – absolutely nothing.

Best is also scared to admit he is frightened, and that heightens the danger he poses. He uses the excuse that he has found the solution, when it was nothing more than a bumbling accident that just happened to do something positive. So he persists – and where is it getting him? After four years of it – nowhere. Best just doesn’t have the courage to admit that he is failing and has failed, and has become a bully just to preserve his outside demeanour. To further that – he also buys another line that comes from the scared little germs who don’t understand something else. Politics. This is especially the case in the United States. That line is conspiracy theory. The whole idea of that is to scare. To put people at odds with their democratically elected officials, instead of using the system in a positive manner. Even known enemies like Generation Rescue and Age of Autism know the score – which is why they tread softly, much to Best’s chagrin. Autism Speaks is also of that ilk. They all still preach the fear line though – especially Autism Speaks.

ASAN on the other hand seeks to temper that fear, and promote understanding so that panic can be reduced and we can concentrate on helping LFA’s properly, correctly and most importantly early. That’s why having Ari Ne’eman on the IACC board is fantastic news, even though having him on the National Disability Council would have been better still.

Best is all about fear. Fear of Autism and fear of government. He believes that he can make inroads into politics by running for President. He is reacting out of fear and seeks to bully his way to the top. That has never worked and it never will work. Being in politics takes humility to make a success of it. Best doesn’t have a modest bone in his body.

Fear of something you don’t understand leads to rash action – usually without thinking. Best’s actions are the actions of a scared old man desperate to have a neurotypical son. He won’t settle for anything less because that scares him and he doesn’t have the courage to adjust through real understanding. With that Doctor Who episode in mind – Best is on a one way trip having his metaphorical neck broken.

Best has finally revealed that he has been served. He created a second blog in my name and the first remains hidden (too late of course as I already have a printed copy). He noted the 13 points of the Statement of Claim, and in the entry only addressed three of them. The claim re being called brain damaged and a mental case, the abuse of all other Autistics, and the removal of the two blogs.

Best is a liar.

First of all, his claim that I have proven myself to be a mental case because I oppose the concept that mercury poisoning causes Autism is ridiculous. That proves me to be completely sane, because the concept is a lot of BS and the vast majority of the scientific community agrees.

Second, Best makes reference to my claims regarding the treatment of his son and he lied again about that. All I have to do is present Best’s own words and it will show that Best was trying to treat Autism and wasn’t concentrating on the gut symptoms. I therefore consider my comments to be justified and true.

Third – and this is the big one – he tries to prevent the deletion of his blogs via him being in the United States and therefore protected by the first amendment. Nope! The offence occurred in Victoria, Australia. He makes the same mistake Dow Jones did in their case against Joe Gutnick as to where publication took place. Publication occurs when an Internet browser calls upon a website address and it shows on the computer screen. The origin of the creation is irrelevant (see Calder v Jones in the Supreme Court of California in 1984 as well as Dow Jones v Gutnick).

He didn’t address anything else, but he did claim to have legal representation. Dewey, Cheatem and Howe. Yeah right – The Three Stooges would be laughing themselves at that one! That was their creation! He also claims to have sent a note to the Supreme Court of Victoria. I’ve faxed the Prothonotary requesting the retaining of what may probably be a letter from a lunatic, and sending me a copy when it arrives – if it does.

He also rejected the idea of counter suing me, upon that same belief re being crazy. At the earliest opportunity I will be inviting him to counter sue, and state that I will NOT be claiming insanity as a defence. I don’t need to. I am sane and I can prove it – and in the finish it’s possible that the court will consider Best as the idiot.

The blog entry will be retained also.

I guess we aren’t going to get a blog post from Best for awhile yet. Here’s why.

I’m still writing, just not blogging. I wrote enough here to fill several books so I’m going to try to turn it all into a book.

Oh so he’s going to write a book now? This was in reply to Lurker on Hating Autism. And this is of interest;

I think the best way to beat them is to simply name them and write about their dishonesty individually.

No, Best, that’s slander. If he actually manages to get a book published (and I doubt he’ll get a good publisher to do that) he’s bound to do a chapter on me – and I’ll have him well and truly.

John Best Junior doesn’t know who is being dishonest in this. The dishonest person is him, and not anyone else he is having a go at. It’s my job to expose Best for the liar and psychological swindler that he is. In legal circles (thank you, Judge Stuart Berger) Autism is genetic in origin. That’s the legal precedent that will stop Best from uttering his lies anywhere without paying for it with every asset that he has.

For this reason, I’ll hold my plans again for a lawsuit and rely on the action against Google.